🇪🇺 * EU guidelines are fraudulent (2)

5G * EU-guidelines are fraudulent 1
Posted on March 29, 2019
5G * EU guidelines are fraudulent 2
Posted on May 17, 2019
5G * EU guidelines are fraudulent 3
Posted on July 30, 2019

In EU guidelines are fraudulent (1) important updates have been added on May 16, 2019. These updates are published in this new post: “5G * EU guidelines are fraudulent (2)”. To be able to understand the full context it is important to study part number one first.

Answer from EU

May 6, 2019 – Letter from EU, via Wojciech Kalamarz.

Info about Wojciech Kałamarz to create awareness of the absence of any study concerning wireless radiation and health hazards: He graduated in International Relations, studied in London, Harvard and Stanford. He worked at the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs from 1989 until 2005.

He joined the European Commission in 2005 and he headed the units for quality control, finance and public procurement. Since January 2017, he has been the Head of Unit for Health Determinants and International Relations in DG SANTE. His area of responsibilities covers the promotion of health through measures addressing factors such as nutrition, physical activity and addictions (alcohol, drugs) as well as the coordination of the Commission/EU voice on global health, including co-operation with WHO, G7, G20, OECD, enlargement, neighbourhood, bilateral and regional partners.

He is serving as the chairperson of the EU High Level Group on Nutrition and Physical Activity, the EU Platform for Action on Diet, Physical Activity and Health, and EU Committee on National Alcohol Policy and Action.

Kalamarz’s answer on my letter to EU’s vice president Frans Timmermans

Kalamarz’s answer on my information, questions and deep concerns about 5G, in an extensive and well documented email, sent on March 28, 2019, to Frans Timmermans: see PDF

The content of the letter from Kalamarz is alarming, and reason for asking Dr. Martin L. Pall to react on especially one sentence in the PDF. Kalamarz writes (the text has been edited by me by adding bold characters and colour to create attention): “In his extensive review Prof. Pall makes reference to the last one of January 2015 which concluded that current exposure limits as laid down in the Council Recommendation are protective for the public.“

Dr. Martin L. Pall reacts on EU’s Wojciech Kałamarz

On May 15, 2019, Dr. Martin L. Pall wrote me (I have edited Dr. Pall’s text where important into bold characters, and/or coloured, to create attention for what is written)

There are actually two falsehoods in that letter from Wojciech Kalamarz. 1. The one that you commented on[2] was the claim that I concluded that current exposure limits are protective. 2. The other one is that we had an interchange. I did, of course email information to them, but this is the first time I have received any response confirming receipt. And because I have not had any communication back from the Commission, it is false to state that we had an interchange. The implications there are obvious.

I am attaching two documents which you are free to use as you wish. The first document clearly shows that when the predictions of the safety guidelines are tested based on 8 different types of repeated studies, in each case they fail predict biological effects and therefore fail to predict safety. In several cases, these are massive failures. In six of the 8, those failures are of multiple types. It is as clear as anything ever is in science, therefore, that the safety guidelines have been falsified and therefore, any assurances of safety based on them are false.

The second document is a series of 12 questions, that should be asked to any defender of the 5G rollout based on those guidelines. I hope that it speaks for itself.

You are welcome to use these as you wish.

Einar Flydal reacts on EU’s Wojciech Kałamarz

I had sent the Kalamarz document also to Norwegian scientist Einar Flydal, because he is working at a book about this subject. The manuscript will be ready at the end of May, 2019. Einar Flydal lectured together with Dr. Martin Pall in Oslo, Norway, in 2014, during the Arne Næss seminar. Video Dr. Pall in Oslo. Video Einar Flydal, Oslo. Einar Flydal lectured also during the 5G Conference May 4 2019, Copenhagen.

Screenphoto from his lecture in Copenhagen: 4:33 in the video.

The red column on the right is the graph that shows the exposure limits in the Nordic countries, including Norway. On the left you see the small columns with recommended numbers by environmental medicine and bio-researchers.

~

.

Letter to DSA, Statens Strålevern, Norway

-Why I write about Norway? Read the intro of part one.-

Again a new step forward: On March 28, 2019, I informed Statens Strålevern (DSA), Norway’s Prime Minister Erna Solberg, Norway’s Minister of Health Bent Høie, Helsedirektoratet, and Telenor.

Answers from DSA, Norway

The answers on my letter to DSA on March 28, 2019, from Lars Klæboe[3][4], Senior Advisor at Norway’s Directorate for Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety DSA, Section Security, Radiation Use and UV, on April 5, 2019, can be read in this PDF.

Lars Klæboe on PubMed (25 research results in total).
Lars Klæboe on ResearchGate (8 research results in total) – skills: Echocardiography,
Cardiac Imaging, Transesophageal Echocardiography, Valvular Heart Disease.

My criticism: Not any study about the biological effects of radiation can be found. Lars Klæboe has a job at DSA to answer questions about a subject that he did not study. I wonder if answers on questions are created by somebody else who works at DSA, answers which are easy to be copied and pasted. During the last year I have corresponded with him about the subject and the answers are always the same, at least: short and therefore not creating any insight in the why of their choices and views. Not any study or publication is offered.

The director of DSA, Ole Harbitz, (See PubMed, zero search results; see ResearchGate, two search results) has not studied anything about the dangers of wireless, EMFs, etc. either, but DSA decides anyway what the guidelines are. The future of all life in Norway is in the hands of people who are not informed, how safe is that?

The most of the answers by DSA’s Lars Klæboe are: “We follow the EU guidelines.” When I asked (see PDF) if they know that these EU guidelines are false, he answered: “No.” Not more. And probably, when the clock shows 15:00, he closes his computer and goes home, to start the next day with opening it, and starting to copy and paste again. At the end of the month he gets his salary on his bank account.

References

[1] The Impact of EMF exposure on our health: https://multerland.blog/2018/08/26/the-impact-of-cell-sites-on-our-health/ (part 1)

[2] Here Dr. Pall refers to the by me quoted sentence in the Kalamarz PDF in the paragraph: “Answer from EU”

[3] Lars Klæboe (DSA, National Radiation Protection, Norway) : – Rays not more than other stuff. They are not dangerous

[4] Lars Klæboe (DSA, National Radiation Protection, Norway): : – No health hazard

References, used in the letter to EU’s Frans Timmermans, on March 28, 2019, and to Norwegian authorities:

[1] CV Arthur Firstenberg: https://multerland.blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/0de9a-curriculumvitaeofarthurfirstenberg.pdf

[2] SCHEER information: http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/opinions_layman/electromagnetic-fields2015/en/index.htm

[3] Website Senator Blumenthal:

https://www.blumenthal.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/at-senate-commerce-hearing-blumenthal-raises-concerns-on-5g-wireless-technologys-potential-health-risks

[4] The Telegraph: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2019/03/09/mobile-safety-standards-relaxed-ahead-5g-networks/

[5] ICNIRP cartel: https://www.investigate-europe.eu/publications/how-much-is-safe/

[6] ICNIRP cartel: https://www.stopumts.nl/doc.php/Berichten%20Internationaal/11876/the___icnirp_cartel___and___the_5g_mass_experiment__

[7] ICNIRP cartel: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qNcaWa85khAk9YO9Z2J3nAFmVw9eMTHw/view

[8] ICNIRP cartel: https://www.kumu.io/Investigate-Europe/whos-who

[9] FCC: https://thetruthaboutcancer.com/fcc-5g/?utm_campaign=daily-content

[10] FCC: https://www.nrdc.org/experts/sharon-buccino/5g-and-fcc-10-reasons-why-you-should-care

[11] FCC: https://truth11.com/2019/03/11/npr-report-on-5g-mentioned-nothing-about-widespread-opposition-or-that-telecom-cant-prove-5g-is-safe/

[12] International Appeal, Stop 5G on Earth and in Space: https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal/

[13] Newsletter International Appeal: https://multerland.blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/stop-5g-space-appeal-newsletter-18-march-2019.pdf

[14] Video Dr. Barrie Trower: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z99_SzoXZdY

[15] Economic fascism: https://fee.org/articles/economic-fascism/

[16] Hippocratic Oath: https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Hippocratic_Oath

[17] The Lancet: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542519618302213

[18] Contact Arthur Firstenberg: https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/contact-us/

[19] Contact Dr. Martin Pall: 638 NE 41stAve., Portland OR 97232 USA / martin_pall@wsu.edu

[20] Contact Einar Flydal: https://einarflydal.com/hjelp/ or by phone: https://www.gulesider.no/einar+flydal+oslo/72491103/person

[21] Documentairy about 5G: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol3tAxnNccY

[22] Documentary, part 2, BBC, 2011: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewdikNQhjUo Start: 8:33 in the video. Interview with Dr. Michael Repacholi, a scientist who is responsible for the WHO position, and who founded the standard setting-body ICNIRP. He no longer works for WHO but he made decisions which affect all our lives. Before he was involved with the WHO he was working in the telecommunications industry, the mobile market.