The review is cited in:
*A mechanistic understanding of human magnetoreception validates the phenomenon of electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS)
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09553002.2024.2435329
Published: December 9, 2024
In: Taylor and Francis Online, International Journal of Radiation Biology
By: Denis L. Henshaw, Alasdair Philips

Cited is
*Review of the scientific evidence on the individual sensitivity to electromagnetic fields (EHS)
https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2021-0038
Published: 2022
In: De Gruyter
By: Dariusz Leszczynski

REVIEW OF THE REVIEW

Neutrality is absent

What is neutrality, being neutral? Being neutral means that one observes in an objective way, not subjective. The term bias can be neutral, when has been indeed proven that something is bias. When one has not any idea about a certain subject, item, phenomenon, like EHS, and one names that what volunteers in EHS research say, or do, etc., “bias”, then one judges about the phenomenon, while not having the right to do so, because ignorant. Then one is guilty of writing bias oneself. In this case: Leszczynski.

Having tried to wrestle through the extended by Leszczynski in 2022 published, 19 PDF pages (without the list with references) long “Review of the scientific evidence on the individual sensitivity to electromagnetic fields (EHS)”, and where is cited from by the two authors of the article “A mechanistic understanding of human magnetoreception validates the phenomenon of electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS)”, I, EHS experience-expert because suffering from it, noticed therefore that my during the years well developed senses for being believed or not, concerning the subject, that Leszczynski tries to be considered neutral, but because of the choice of his frequently coloured words, and how he has built up sentences, proving not to be neutral at all.

He is without any doubt on the side of those who have not understood the phenomenon electromagnetic hyper sensitivity. Factually we, the victims, have to prove him and his co-researcher, in their planned EHS research [see next paragraph] that EHS is real. In his review he does his utmost to align himself with the world wide so well known cold dogmatic “science” (read: bias) of those who are not even willing to understand it because EHS is, according to them, something between the ears.

Example of by Leszczynski used terms. Mind the word “bias” related with volunteers:

EHS research by Leszczynski and De Vocht is doomed to fail

Leszczynski has planned a research about EHS, together with ICNIRP commissioner, and therefore denier of EHS, Frank de Vocht, in 2025. Via Leszczynski’s blog and EMFSA they have invited volunteers to participate, without adding essential information about who they, the EHS-“researchers” are, what their professional education and skills are to be able to prepare and execute such a research, what they know about the biological effects, about the false and therefore misleading and hidden health dangers of the false safety guidelines created by ICNIRP, where it will take place, how, what the research methods are, and what the rights are of the volunteers, for instance the right to disagree with what is “diagnosed”, how it has been diagnosed, and how it is interpreted, to force to withdraw the results and to forbid to publish these. The volunteer must be able to fully understand the research, the result, the used methods, and the language that has been used, in order to be able to explain the phenomenon and the test results also to the ignorant in the own circle of friends, family, governments, health care institutions, courts, schools and universities. The entire “research” has to be, after being approved by the volunteers, peer reviewed by insiders of the phenomenon, those who show real insight, in physics, biology, who show affinity, crystal clear ethics, and who are for 100% up to date about the scam of ICNIRP. Future researchers must be aware that they are investigating and interrogating victims of completely ignorant health care practitioners, victims of physical, psychological and mental abuse created by the lies of ICNIRP, mainstream media, general practitioners, and the by ICNIRP created environmental EMF pollution that takes place for as long ICNIRP exists, and is increasing dramatically since 2012.

Because of his easy to notice doubt, even bias, created by his unbelief of the, despite on real facts based, existence of the phenomenon EHS, one can already in advance conclude that their “research” will fail because of missing research methods, as mentioned in the Henshaw/Philips article, and that those who volunteer in Leszczynski’s and De Vocht’s to be expected clumsy, unprofessional “research” will without any doubt go back home deeper traumatized than they already were before volunteering and participating.

Missing: the mechanistic understanding of human magnetoreception

Every scientist who wants to investigate the phenomenon EHS, should in the first place be educated in the mechanistic understanding of human magnetoreception, as is explained in the article “A mechanistic understanding of human magnetoreception validates the phenomenon of electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS)”, published on December 9, 2024
Leszczynski, taking an ICNIRP commissioner into the planned investigation is, by doing that, humiliating in advance all who belong to the group EHS. This is explained in my December 2, 2024, article: Warning.

Guinea pigs

Leszczynski should have, in the first place, so even before writing and publishing a review about EHS tests, been informed about all what is needed to prepare and execute a reliable and ethically correct research, and concerning his own planned test: to search for a co-researcher who is into detail up to date about the biological effects of EMF and shows real, ethically correct, affinity with the subject. De Vocht is not, but Leszczynski not either, since he does not show any. Leszczynski is not prepared at all on a professional investigation of EHS. He and an eventual co-researcher have to be investigated themselves and in the first place before being allowed to organize a research about and with physically, psychologically and mentally deeply traumatized people, to avoid that these people will be even more traumatized. Those who suffer from EHS live in inhumane circumstances, that are bagatellized. World wide. Using these victims as guinea pigs is unethical and cruel.

When one seriously reads Leszczynski’s review it becomes clear that he has not any realistic idea himself about what EHS really is, or could be, what the causes ARE, because already demonstrated during many decades, and reason why he misses therefore the intelligence to consciously and ethically understand the details of the total picture. Asking De Vocht, a notorious humiliator and denier of all what differs from his ICNIRP thermal effects only dogma, to be a co-researcher, is nothing less than spitting in the face of all who suffer from EHS.

Additional:

• The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life, authors: Robert O Becker and Gary Selden. First edition: 1985
• Multerland blog: Articles about EHS
• Documentary: 2017 / Wi-Fi Refugees. Electrosensitive people try to escape wireless technology – Video
  By: RT Documentary
  Published: July, 2017
• Multerland blog: Articles about ICNIRP

Electromagnetism in the human body

“The heart’s magnetic field, which is the strongest rhythmic field produced by the human body, not only envelops every cell of the body, but also extends out in all directions into the space around us. The heart’s magnetic field can be measured several feet away from the body by sensitive magnetometers. Research conducted at HMI suggests the heart’s field is an important carrier of information. ”

From the book:
Science of the Heart, Volume 2 Exploring the Role of the Heart in Human Performance
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293944391_Science_of_the_Heart_Volume_2_Exploring_the_Role_of_the_Heart_in_Human_Performance_An_Overview_of_Research_Conducted_by_the_HeartMath_Institute
Published: November 1, 2015
By: Rollin McCraty Ph.D. (Author), Sandy Royall (Illustrator)

Volume 1: Science of the Heart: Vol 1 (1993-2001) Exploring the Role of the Heart in Human Performance
https://www.heartmath.org/resources/downloads/science-of-the-heart/