“It is the coherent¹ nature of the radiation,
and the information that it carries, that kills.“

From: “Radio Wave Packet“
What You Need to Know about Wireless Technology
By: Arthur Firstenberg (1950-2025)
President, Cellular Phone Task Force
First published: September 2001
Revised: August 2022 English / Nederlands / norsk  / français / svenska / italiano / 日本語 

Series about EHS:

1. Intro: Dr. Erica Mallery-Blythe on Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity and EMF Limits
2. Radio Wave Packet
   • 1. The History of “Radio Wave Sickness” Studies
   • 2. Biological Effects of Radio Waves: Signs and Symptoms
   • 3. Biological Effects of Radio Waves: Power Level Is Irrelevant

3. Biological Effects of Radio Waves: Power Level Is Irrelevant

As the chart at the beginning of this document shows, exposure levels are irrelevant where it concerns radio waves. Biological effects are found at 10 μW/cm2, at 0.01 μW/cm2, at 0.00001 μW/cm2, at 0.00000001 μW/cm2, and at 0.0000000000001 μW/cm2.

¤ As Allan Frey² wrote, living organisms use electromagnetic fields (EMFs) for everything from cellular communication to nervous system function.

“Electromagnetic fields are not a foreign substance to living beings like lead or cyanide. With foreign substances, the greater the dose, the greater the effect—a dose-response relationship.”

Instead, he said, a living being is like a radio receiver.

“The EMF signal the radio detects and transduces into the sound of music is almost immeasurably weak.”

Similarly, even an immeasurably weak radio signal can interfere with biological functions. (Frey 1990, 1993)

¤ Dr. Ross Adey³, at Loma Linda University School of Medicine, wrote that

our cells “whisper” to each other with electromagnetic signals. He said that EMFs act at the atomic level and that “a threshold might not exist” for the effects of radio waves. (Adey 1993)

¤ Biophysicist Neil Cherry⁴, at Lincoln University in New Zealand, wrote that

radio signals “can interfere with hearts, brains and cells at extremely low intensities, approaching zero exposure” (Cherry 2000). He later presented “conclusive evidence” that “the safe level of exposure is zero.” (Cherry 2001)

For some effects, there is even an inverse dose-response, i.e. the lower the exposure level, the greater the harm. In other words, the more the external signal approaches the infinitesimal strength of our bodies’ own internal signals, the more it is recognized by the body, and the more it interferes with life.

¤ Thus, Leif Salford⁵’s team at Lund University found that the greatest damage to the blood-brain barrier occurred at the lowest dose of radiation (reduced ten thousand-fold), not the highest dose. (Persson 1997).

¤ Numerous researchers, including Carl Blackman⁶ at the US Environmental Protection Agency, have found that

microwave radiation causes calcium to flow out of brain cells.

For this effect, these researchers have found power windows of maximal effect, i.e. the effect decreases at both lower and higher levels (Blackman 1980, 1986; Bawin 1977; Dutta 1986; Kunjilwar and Behari 1993). And it is the lowest power windows, not the highest, that have the greatest effect: the effect at an SAR of 0.0007 W/kg was quadruple the effect at an SAR of 2.0 W/kg (Dutta 1986).

¤ Maria Sadchikova⁷ and her Soviet colleagues consistently reported in the 1960s and 1970s that among people occupationally exposed to microwave radiation, the sickest were those exposed to the lowest, not the highest levels. (Sadchikova 1960, 1974).

¤ Igor Belyaev⁸, at Stockholm University, found a genetic effect that occurred at specific frequencies. The magnitude of the effect did not change with power level over 14 orders of magnitude, all the way down to 0.00000000001 microwatts per square centimeter. (Belyaev 1996)

¤ Nikolai Kositsky⁹ and his colleagues in Kiev, Ukraine reiterated that

external radio signals interfere with our bodies’ own internal signalling, and that it is the informational content of radio waves, and not their power level, that causes harm.

They reviewed 40 years of research in the Soviet Union and concluded:

“Biological effects associated with these interactions depend not on the strength of the energy carried into one or another system, but on the information carried into it.” (Kositsky 2001)

Thus most of the effects of radio waves on our bodies are caused not by their power levels but by their frequencies, bandwidths, pulsations, waveforms, and all the other attributes that enable them to carry INFORMATION and make them useful to CELL PHONES and COMPUTERS.

“It is the coherent nature of the radiation,
and the information that it carries, that kills.“

And therefore light (LiFi¹⁰) and any other carrier of the same information is just as harmful, as are lasers. A laser is coherent light.

Our evolution took place without microwaves

[Additional info by Multerland: “If you want to find the secrets of the Universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.” – Nikola Tesla—————– ——The earth’s magnetosphere¹¹ is an electrical energy field that includes the Earth’s atmosphere¹², the global electric circuit¹³, Earth itself, its biodiversity, fair weather, and us, earthlings, with natural processes, natural frequencies, natural electricity, and originally without the interference of industrial, man made, artificial electricity, and industrial, man made, artificial microwaves. Our human electrical energy field exists because of, and according to, utterly complex natural laws of physics, and without the global electric circuit life is impossible. We ARE [natural]electricity¹⁴. The human brain is human, and too tiny to fathom Creation, and its cosmic laws. Despite that, or factually because of that, the human being walks like an elephant¹⁵ over the harmonious laws of the global electric circuit and creates chaos, diseases, and death.]

The “Radio Wave Packet” text continues below the picture: “We evolved without….”

We evolved without microwaves and without coherent radiation. The microwave radiation from the Sun is not coherent, is not centered at any particular frequency, varies in total from .000000112 μW/cm2 to .0001 μW/cm2 when the Sun is most active, and we are only exposed to it during the day; at night, only the far weaker microwaves from the stars reach Earth.

Living beings should not ever contact, or be near, any source of coherent radiation, or any source of microwave radiation. Not WiFi, not Bluetooth, not baby monitors, not microwave ovens, not smartmeters²⁰, and not cell phones.

Not even for a few seconds.

Cell phones, because of their ubiquity and their proximity to the body, are causing by far the most harm to health, society, and planet.

Footnotes

1. Coherent: a word that is used in any field that involves waves, such as radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields (EMFs).
   Coherent waves have a constant phase relationship and the same frequency, while incoherent waves have random phase relationships and a variety of frequencies. The sun emits incoherent waves, according to “Radio Wave Packet” while there are websites and videos in which is stated that the sun emits coherent waves. More peer reviewed information from reliable physicists is needed about this subject. Possible sources that could be used to find out more: 1. https://www.azooptics.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=2737 – 2. https://unifyphysics.com/coherent-and-incoherent-addition-of-waves/ – Reactions and info can be sent to Multerland via the contact form. ↩︎
2. Dr. Allan Frey – https://cellphonetaskforce.org/the-work-of-allan-h-frey/ ↩︎
3. Dr. Ross Adey – https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(04)16699-3/fulltext ↩︎
4. Dr. Neil Cherry – https://neilcherry.nz/hestia-front/ ↩︎
5. Dr. Leif Salford – https://cellphonetaskforce.org/the-work-of-leif-salford/ ↩︎
6. Dr. Carl Blackman – https://icbe-emf.org/commissioners/carl-f-blackman/ ↩︎
7. Dr. Maria Sadchikova – unfortunately no biographical information found ↩︎
8. Dr. Igor Belyaev – https://icbe-emf.org/commissioners/igor-belyeav/ ↩︎
9. Dr. Nikolai Kositsky – https://cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/influence_of_high_frequency_electromagnetic_radiation_at_non_thermal_intensities.pdf ↩︎
10. LiFi: Chapter 9 of the video: 5G, Birds, Bees and Humanity https://youtu.be/MpdJ_t5XMvw?si=i6ISKbDmKYmUtyVe&t=1636 ↩︎
11. Magnetosphere – 1. https://reasons.org/explore/blogs/todays-new-reason-to-believe/earths-magnetosphere-appears-designed-for-habitability 2. https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/space-science/what-are-magnetic-fields-how-do-they-affect-universe ↩︎
12. Atmosphere – The atmosphere is host to a complex electric environment, ranging from a global electric circuit generating fluctuating atmospheric electric fields to local lightning strikes and ions. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00484-020-01960-7 ↩︎
13. The global electric circuit – 1. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00484-020-01960-7/figures/1 – 2. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00484-020-01960-7 ↩︎
14. The Body Electric, electromagnetism and the foundation of life – Author: Robert O. Becker – https://www.painscience.com/bibliography.php?bec ↩︎
15. Book: The Wireless Elephant in the Room – Camilla R.G. Rees https://www.amazon.com/Wireless-Elephant-Room-overview-emerging/dp/1542431344/ ↩︎
16. The Cycle Of The Soul – Jozef Rulof https://rulof.org/The-Cycle-of-the-Soul-1.html ↩︎
17. Dr. Ulrich Warnke – https://kompetenzinitiative.com/dr-rer-nat-ulrich-warnke/ ↩︎
18. Dr. Ulrich Warnke: “Quantum Physics” Is The Merging of Natural and Human Sciences – He explains in this video the importance of this merging, because human sciences are not present in natural sciences, physics, in the research of the impact of electromagnetic radiation on the human being’s natural, emotional, mental and spiritual development. https://youtu.be/V6Mbv4MdQHY ↩︎
19. Dr. Ulrich Warnke – Brochure “Birds, Bees and Mankind”. https://kompetenzinitiative.com/bees-birds-and-mankind/ ↩︎
20. Note: smartmeters were not mentioned in the Radio Wave Packet, but smartmeters radiate coherent radio waves: radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and there are even smartmeters that work with laser. According to AI information, that popped up when I was googling on it, and on the top of the page available, while not asked for it: “this radiation is considered safe by regulatory bodies”. AI does not add more info, while they should have written: the regulatory bodies are WHO, ICNIRP, FCC, ARPANSA, Safetycode6, but their “safety” levels are solely based on thermal effects, they deny biological effects, while (severe) biological effects occur at much lower levels as the declared safe thermal levels of these regulatory bodies. These regulatory bodies maintain conflicts of interest with the related industries. Adequate and 100% reliable info about ICNIRP, FCC, WHO about EMF is to be found on the website of the International Commission on the Biological Effects of EMF: ICBE-EMF – https://icbe-emf.org/  ↩︎

SHARE THIS

• Bluesky